Council announces immediate end to West Ealing South LTN (21)

Following Hounslow Council’s decision to close Swyncombe Ave for two months for road works Ealing Council has decided this makes LTN21 unworkable. As a result, it will dismantle all the road blocks over this weekend (22/23 may) and restore the area to how it was previously.

Ealing Council plans to consult on some areas of LTN21 which local residnets say are successful. The new Council leader Peter Mason has said all the remaining LTNs will be subject to a CPZ style consultation for a vote for residents vto say if LTNs will work for their neighbourhood.

Ealing Council’s website has the full statement and a video of Peter Mason announcing the LTN changes is here.

Last chance to stop the redevelopment of Perceval House

We have received this from Save Ealing’s Centre:

‘On March 31st Ealing’s Council’s planning committee approved the plans to redevelop the Council’s Perceval House offices and build a 26 storey tower. London Borough of Ealing  needs the Mayor’s approval to proceed. Sadiq will decide on Monday May 23rd.  He can ‘call in’ the plans for a public hearing for everyone to have their say.  We have a week to persuade him that he should listen to the views of everyone who objected so strongly against it.


Write today to Jules Pipe, the Mayor’s deputy for planning – – to ask for a public hearing. You can use this model letter:

Dear Sadiq,

Please listen to local people.

At an unscheduled meeting during the pre-election period Ealing Council’s planning committee approved plans to replace its Perceval House offices with new offices and a 26 storey tower. If the scheme goes ahead it will cause untold harm to local communities and destroy the character of our own centre. As a partner of the developers, the Council has serious conflicts of interest in the plans. This has led it to ignore over 2300 objections from the community. Please listen to local people and call in the plans so that they can be properly considered at a public hearing at which all sides can have their say.

You can add other points to highlight your particular objections. These could include:

  • The 26-storey tower would be unacceptably high in a suburban location.
  • It would dominate nearby listed buildings including the recently restored Grade 1 Pitzhanger Manor.
  • The character of Ealing would be seriously harmed.
  • The tower will take light from hundreds of homes.
  • The proposal is mainly for one or two bedroomed flats, not suitable for families
  • Built on public land more than 50% of the new homes should be affordable
  • There would be very little play space for families
  • Ealing Council no longer even needs the new offices it plans to build
  • There is no need for new shop units when Dickens Yard sites remain empty.
  • High polluting construction traffic will be using residential streets for years
  • Redeveloping Perceval House which is less than 40 years old is not sustainable environmental

Please copy what you say into the GLA’s comments page.

Thank You from Save Ealing’s Centre group’

Last chance to save Victoria Hall

The Friends of Victoria Hall have sent out this appeal for donations to save it:

The Friends of Victoria Hall (FoVH) urgently need your help to keep the Victoria Hall open for community use.

The Hall was the centre of civic life in Ealing for 125 years until it was shut down in 2019. It has hosted presidents and prime ministers, concerts, multicultural celebrations, public enquiries, election hustings and election counts, exhibitions from art to model railways, protest meetings, blood donation drives, graduation ceremonies, dance classes, amateur dramatics, film societies, NHS cardiac rehabilitation and anti-smoking classes and much more. This will all end if LBE disposes of it.

On March 12 the Charity Commission said it would allow Ealing Council to hand over the Hall to hotel operators Mastcraft. Friends of Victoria Hall say the Hall was built with funds raised from the community to commemorate Queen Victoria’s Jubilee as a place for public use. It doesn’t belong to the Council and they have no right to dispose of it.

FoVH is working with one of the UK’s top charity lawyers to appeal the Charity Commission’s ruling. Their appeal will be dealt with by the Charity Tribunal with a judge presiding over it, so it will cost money. FoVH need your help to pay the legal fees. 

The Friends urgently need your help. Please pledge as much as you can to help us cover the legal costs. Be sure to sign up for Gift Aid to make your donation go even further – the HM Charity reference number is ZD045A7. The people of Ealing will be in your debt for generations to come for helping to save this precious community amenity.

Please help with a donation on FoVH’s Crowd Justice page (and don’t forget to agree to Gift Aid):

More information:

Facebook: Twitter:

You can find out more about the hall, it’s history and some of the local personalities who want to save it on this short video

And there is more about the Victoria Hall saga on the local Ealing videonews outlet on Exposurebox at


Save Ealing’s Centre Group

Opposition against West Ealing LTN21 still strong

The interim results from the CAMTAG (Coldershaw and Midhurst Traffic Action Group) survey of LTN 21 – the West Ealing area south of the Uxbridge Road indicate opposition is still strong. CAMTAG distributed 5807 leaflets and of the 1360 responses 78% wanted the LTN removed and 19% wanted it to stay.

CAMTAG will be looking at comments from the residents who participated in this survey and use these in developing the full survey for the summer.

WEN will publicise the full survey as soon as we have the details and will urge everyone to take part in order to get the most accurate possible picture of residents’ views on LTN 21.

There’s more on this story on the Ealing Today website.

Ealing Matters newsletter – latest on developments in Ealing

Ealing Matters Newsletter Issue 10 April 2021

Hello everyone. As the days get longer and spring is in the air, we hope that you are keeping well. As well as a round-up of what is going on across the borough, this issue highlights Ealing Council’s ambitious plans for Broadway Living, its wholly-owned housing development subsidiary, and the conflicts of interest involved particularly when it comes to development of council-owned land.


Broadway Living is a Council owned residential property developer, whose first completed development was in 2014 at Eastcote Lane in Northolt. Broadway Living Registered Provider (BLRP) is a new subsidiary of Broadway Living. It will own and manage new affordable housing on behalf of the Council. In November 2020, Ealing Council announced a loan of £400 million to BLRP.

BLRP plans to build 1,192 ‘genuinely affordable’ homes (a mix of London Affordable Rent, London Living Rent and Shared Ownership as defined in the new London Plan), 178 Discounted Market Rent homes and 143 market rate homes for sale or rent on Council-owned land. With these developments the Council aims to fulfil its manifesto commitment to delivering 2,500 affordable homes and generate enough revenue to ‘develop a sustainable and long-term pipeline of genuinely affordable homes’ and ‘re-establish housing development as part of the Council’s core business’. The Council has already earmarked a number of unspecified school sites across the borough and land with potential for a further 6,000 new homes for this next stage.

Perceval House is to be demolished and redeveloped

Ealing Council will have to borrow to fund the loan to BLRP. Apart from the 50-year life cycle of the loan, this is a high-risk strategy for the following reasons:

  • The plans rely on planning approvals for 18 sites, the two largest of which are Perceval House and Gurnell Leisure Centre, which have generated huge levels of opposition locally. Ealing Council’s assertion that this risk will be mitigated by ‘close working with the planning department’ is not reassuring. As the landowner, developer and planning authority, the Council is hopelessly conflicted. (The Arden Road and Dean Gardens Council car parks we highlighted in the last newsletter are also part of the plan, and planning applications for those were indeed recently approved.)
  • The Council is under pressure to get started on these homes as more than a thousand of them have attracted £100 million of grant money from the Greater London Authority (GLA), which is built into the BLRP business plan. The terms of the grant require that they are started no later than March 2023.
  • According to the BLRP business plan, repayment of the loan will rely on the Council’s ability to sell the Shared Ownership and market rate homes at a profit, which will be subject to prevailing economic and market forces.
  • Other London councils, such as Croydon, Bexley and Merton, have got into financial trouble with housing delivery vehicles of this type. Again, it is not reassuring that one of the directors of Broadway Living is also a director of Bexley Council’s housing company.

And if all this turns sour, who will pay for it? As the sole shareholder in Broadway Living, that would be Ealing Council, i.e. you and me.


Where are we with the Local Development Plan?

Since the last newsletter there have been two Local Development Plan Advisory Committee (LDPAC) meetings, but little progress. Following Councillor Peter Mason’s resignation, Julian Bell, the Leader of the Council chaired the first of these, which took place on 1 October 2020 and looked at the implications of the Government White Paper ‘Planning for the Future’ and gave an update on Ealing’s Strategic and Local Infrastructure Delivery Plans. A further meeting took place on 2 December 2020. This was chaired by the newly appointed Cabinet portfolio holder for Housing, Planning and Transformation, Councillor Mik Sabiers, who has moved from Environment and Highways. The main subject of this was also infrastructure. See Ealing Matters’ Guide to the New Local Development Plan for links to the documents from these meetings.

After some reluctance on the part of the Council, a representative of Ealing Matters spoke at the end of the December meeting to ask for a revised timetable (called the Local Development Scheme) for the Local Development Plan (no answer forthcoming) and to chase once more the elusive Authority Monitoring Reports (see below). The draft minutes said only that Ealing Matters ‘raised some issues which were not regarding the main agenda item’. Judge for yourself whether you think these issues were relevant or not.

Next LDPAC: Authority Monitoring Reports (AMRs)

Those of you who have visited our website recently may have read about the ongoing struggle to get Ealing Council to fulfil its statutory duty and publish Authority Monitoring Reports (AMRs) for the years 2014/15 to 2019/20. In the fast-changing world of planning, it is essential for planning authorities to assess regularly the implementation of their Local Development Plan against its objectives and adjust accordingly. Ealing has not done this since 2013/14 and we can see the results all around us. To date there have been 28 requests that we know of for this information dating back to September 2016. A letter from David Scourfield, Chief Planning Officer, in answer to our recent Stage 2 complaint stated that AMRs covering 2014-20 ‘should hopefully be published before the end of March 2021’. This did not happen, and we have now escalated the complaint to Stage 3 (internal review).


In December 2020 Ealing Council released an interim assessment of the nine LTNs installed between July and November 2020 using Experimental Traffic Orders (ETOs). The feedback received has led to a number of changes to the schemes:

  • The replacement of bollards with camera enforcement
  • An exemption from camera enforcement for Blue Badge holders within the LTN where they live (subject to registration)
  • An exemption for Council authorised vehicles transporting people with a mobility impairment where there is camera enforcement
  • A review of advanced warning signage
  • Specific actions in LTN 20 (West Ealing North), LTN 48 (Adrienne Road)

Some of these changes required a modification to the ETOs, with the effect of re-setting the 6-months consultation period to a new date of August 2021. Campaigners are furious about this, not least because they were part of a multi-borough legal case (with Hackney, Hounslow, Lambeth and Camden), which came to Court on 11 February. This was dropped at the eleventh hour following the Council’s decision to revoke the original Orders and to make new ones. While the Council has agreed to meet the campaigners’ legal costs, not for the first time it is using local taxpayers’ money to pay for its mistakes.

Campaigners are not happy:

  • During the first ETO Elthorne and Northfield councillors made a public commitment to support the removal of LTN 21 should residents come out against it after six months. The interim assessment shows that residents reject the scheme consistently across three different consultation methods. More than 1,750 residents have emailed said councillors criticising their failure to remove the LTN as promised.
  • Acton residents were told that no further LTNs would be introduced before definitive conclusions had been reached about the first set, but the Council is trying to go back on this agreement in their area.

Now for a round-up of news from around the borough.


Perceval House, 14/16 Uxbridge Road

The Council’s controversial plans to replace its Perceval House offices with new offices, a new public library and 477 flats in tower blocks up to 26 storeys high have stumbled shambolically in recent weeks. To the surprise of all, after two hours of heated debate the plans were deferred by the 17 February Planning Committee, which was unhappy about the affordable housing proposed. The scheme was sent back to a specially convened Committee meeting on 10 March. While it was approved after four hours of discussion, YouTube failures meant that the public was unable to witness the vote, forcing the Council to annul the meeting. Following an unprecedented third meeting convened on 31 March, and after almost three hours of presentation and debate, the scheme was passed by eight votes to four with one abstention.

The plans, proposed by the Council in partnership with the Vistry Group, were condemned by more than 2,300 objectors, who say it will cram too much onto a very cramped site. They say the resulting development will do serious harm to Ealing’s historic character and several key listed buildings, particularly by setting a precedent for a cluster of high buildings in central Ealing, and by depriving surrounding homes of their natural light.

The application now has to go to the GLA for approval by the London Mayor and then to the Government who can ‘call it in’ to decide at a public inquiry.

Dr Rupa Huq MP and ward councillor Seema Kumar spoke against the plans at all three meetings and both are expected to maintain their opposition. The delay complicates things seriously, particularly for the Council’s Broadway Living project, which is dependent on the scheme going ahead. The row also looks likely to get caught up in the campaign for the Mayoral election in May. Parties from all sides of the political divide will be inundated with objections to the plans from its critics.

CP House, 87-107 Uxbridge Road

Dwarfing the Hampton by Hilton hotel next door

The March 17 Planning Committee approved a massive redevelopment of CP House, a 1960s office block on the south side of the Uxbridge Road almost opposite the fire station. The existing 50,000m2 offices will be replaced by a large 235,000m2 block bringing forward the building line and raising the height effectively by three storeys. Views from Walpole Park will be considerably impacted, and the development will visually dominate the homes on Mattock Lane. The developers say they want to open a new pedestrian route between Uxbridge Rd and Mattock Lane. While this would improve permeability, it would need to be done very carefully to avoid harm to the Ealing Green CA.

Victoria Hall

The saga of Victoria Hall looks likely to drag on. Back in 2017 the Council agreed to hand over the Hall to hotel developer Mastcraft as part of a deal to dispose of the whole Town Hall complex for just £2.5 million. At the time they did not realise that the Hall did not belong to them, but that they were just the trustees of a charitable gift to the Ealing community to celebrate Queen Victoria’s jubilee.

The Council has now spent the past two years trying to get the Charity Commission to approve their deal in the face of opposition by the Friends of the Victoria Hall (FoVH), who want to keep the Hall for the community to use as was intended. For most of this period the Council has kept the Hall shut down, denying the community use of it. They admit that they have already spent almost the entire £2.5 million they hope to receive from Mastcraft on fees and other costs incurred for the disposal, so little if anything at all, will be left for any future trust activities.

In March, and in the face of FoVH’s continuing opposition, the Charity Commission wrote to say it would allow Ealing’s deal to go ahead. FoVH holds that giving away a philanthropic gift this way is against charity law. They are expected to challenge the deal in the courts. Their case is presented in this entertaining 12-minute-long video featuring several local personalities.


Warren Farm

With QPR pulling out of its plans to use the Warren Farm as a training ground last year, attention has switched to finding a better use for this precious nature reserve. The Brent River and Canal Society (BRCS), has published an enticing vision which would include bringing together the neighbouring areas of green space into a nature reserve. A petition calling on Julian Bell and Sadiq Khan to take action to safeguard Warren Farm for wildlife and for people has attracted over 7000 signatures. Why not add your name to it?


Turning a community into a building site

Having to put up with the catastrophic atmospheric pollution caused by redevelopment of the Southall Gasworks site, Southall residents are coming to terms with the reality that their town has become a massive building site in which they struggle to live their lives. A walk through the centre soon reveals the horror of it. All five senses are overwhelmed. The noise and disruption of building works never stills, and neither does the traffic congestion, especially over Southall’s only railway bridge. Pneumatic drills and paving stone grinders vibrate throughout your whole body. Dust and debris hang in the air and get into your mouth and up your nose.

Developments so far (in green) and what is yet to come )in red)

Things will only get worse in the years ahead. While 3,750 homes are scheduled for the Gasworks Site, more than 8,700 are planned or approved in other sites around the town – mostly in giant blocks of flats rising up to 29 storeys high. Even when all the disruption is over, few Southall families are expected to enjoy them. Most of the new flats will have just one or two bedrooms which makes them unsuitable for families with two children of different genders. A full 63% of the new homes will be provided at market prices and just 13.5% of the new homes will be ‘affordable’ at London Affordable Housing rents.

What’s in a name?

We have written before about the Berkeley Homes development, aka Southall Waterside, on the site of the old Southall Gasworks. Imagine our surprise to find that the development has now been rebranded as Southall Green Quarter. Could it be that news of the air and soil pollution connected with the site, as reported in our last newsletter, has seeped out to East Asian buyers, or is it a ploy to try and revive flagging sales by making it look like a new-to-market development?


51-56 Manor Road and 53-55 Drayton Green Road (corner site next to West Ealing Station)

Developers southern Grove are appealing against Ealing’s October 2020 Planning Committee’ refusal of a 19- storey tower outside West Ealing station. The October 2020 decision was a major victory for the Stop the Towers (STT) campaign group, and the 2,359 individual objectors including Local MP James Murray, who had opposed it as inappropriate in this location. STT has sprung into action to fight the scheme for a second time at a virtual public inquiry to be held later this year. STT is appointing an expert barrister to argue their case against the scheme, whose scale and density the Council has acknowledged would harm the character and appearance of the low-rise surrounding area.

The case is important, not just for the immediate area, but because, if it goes ahead, it will establish a precedent for ever larger towers all along the railway west out of Ealing. STT needs support to help pay their legal costs. Click here if you would like to make a contribution.

Leisure Centre victory secures a future for Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) at Gurnell

To widespread delight and surprise, Ealing’s 17 March Planning Committee on 17 March, voted by 10-1 to reject the Council’s plan to redevelop Gurnell Leisure Centre, which has been closed since the beginning of the Covid pandemic. The plans were opposed by around 1,700 objectors and Planning Committee member Cllr Ray Wall criticised it as looking ‘like a warehouse with two chimneys plonked on top of it’.

The scheme involved what the Council described as a ‘facilitating’ development involving the construction of 6 huge blocks of flat up to 17 storeys high on Metropolitan Open Land, which is protected by the London Plan in the same way as Green Belt. The flats are part of the Broadway Living Registered Providers business plan, and the risks associated with Broadway Living applied here – not least because the scheme’s own consultants said it would be built at a financial loss for them. Add to that the ballooning cost of the replacement leisure centre within this hybrid scheme and flooding of the site last autumn, and Ealing’s Planning Committee members could see that the whole project constituted a very risky bet.

Gurnell Leisure Centre’s many users are petitioning the Council to reopen the centre, which has been closed since the Covid lockdown began. You can add your name here.

Majestic Wine Warehouse site, 41-42 Hastings Road

The housing association, A2Dominion, announced plans for 183 flats (at least 64 at London Affordable Rent, the rest private) housed in blocks rising from three to 25 storeys on this site diagonally opposite the Manor Road tower. Since then silence, no doubt as A2Dominion wait to see what happens with the Manor Road site. Stop the Towers is also fighting this development, not least because the proposals bear no relation to the policies for the site contained in the Council’s Local Plan.

With thanks to Eric Leach for his contribution to this latest issue. Contributions that you think would be of interest to the Ealing Matters member groups are welcome.

Interim survey of West Ealing Low Traffic Neighbourhood

The Coldershaw and Midhurst Traffic Action Group (CAMTAG) of West Ealing residents has launched an online interim survey of one of the controversial Low Traffic Neighbourhoods in West Ealing – LTN21. Leaflets have been delivered to households within the LTN21 area. If you haven’t received one details of how to get a leaflet can be found here.

This LTN, which covers an area south of the Uxbridge Road, was orginally due to last for a trial six months but the Council extended it by a further six months to August 2021. This survey will be folowed up by a full door-to-door survey in the summer.

Whether for or against the LTN it’s important to give your views so CAMTAG can get a good response and an accurate sense of people’s views.

Gurnell development plans overwhelmingly rejected

By a surprisingly large majority of 10 votes to one, the Council’s plans to redevelop the Gurnell Grove site were rejected at last night’s (Wednesday 17th March) planning committee.

The Save Gurnell team has run a very effective campaign against these plans – which would have meant the loss of Metropolitan Open Land and over 150 mature trees along with the building of six 17-storey tower blocks.

Let’s hope the Council now takes time to learn lessons from this and works with local residents to design a more appropriate scheme for this site.

Manor Road tall tower developers appeal Council’s decision

No great surprise. Southern Grove and Thames Valley Metropolitan Housing are appealing against the Council’s decision to refuse permission for their plans to develop the site next to the new West Ealing railway station. (Read background here)

The very first plan from the developers proposed a 26-storey tower on this site. This was modified to 20-storeys after much local opposition. The Stop The Towers group organised a very effective campaign against what was seen as overdevelopment. Come decison time last October and the Council, somewhat surprisingly, refused permission. This will now go to appeal. This story has some way to run yet, so we will update this when we hear more.

Can you help with ideas for some low-cost improvements to Dean Gardens?

We have posted about improvements and a redesign of Dean Gardens many times on this blog. Sadly, the most recent plan for a major redesign of the park has been caught up in TfL’s serious financial problems and the plan, which was part of the TfL funded West Ealing Liveable Neighbourhood scheme, has been put on hold for the immediate future.

However, a small amount of funding has now become available from TfL and there is now the possibility of making some low-cost improvements to Dean Gardens

Possible low-cost projects could be ones such as adding some one or two new items of play equipment to the toddlers area; a couple of raised beds for a community garden corner; resurfacing the cycle route at the back and so on.

The Council wants to hear your ideas for these sorts of improvements and will be running an online workshop about this next week. If you are interested in getting involved please go to the following link to a Doodle calendar to give your availability for this workshop.